"Woman", "female", "lady", "feminine" or "Girl".
In today's era, many types of discussions keep happening among the people regarding the "direction" and "condition" of "woman". I have never taken this subject so seriously.
However, in our society, our ancient women have made a lot of efforts to change their thinking and to get their proper place and respect, which have also been successful to a great extent.
But even today, sometimes every woman has to face the small or mean thinking of the society at some point in her life.
When I came across in contact with social people. I felt something which I had never felt in my life before. Then I started analyzing the condition of women in different ways.
We cannot put all the blame on women by seeing or hearing only one sided situation. Those who really analyze the life of a woman, never wrong the steps taken by women. It is often heard by such analysts β those who have tortured women are now themselves suffering.
There is "Kali" in every woman,
"Durga" is
"Sita" is
"Saraswati" is
"Parvati".
Everyone knows and accepts this thing, but very few people "accept".
When a woman proves her purity by becoming "Sita", and even then the society throws mud at her, then somewhere she takes the form of "Durga", "Kali", "Mahakali".
Even though it may be wrong to see a woman in many situations, but whenever you analyze her closely, in 95% of the situations, you will not see her as a demon, but as "Mahakali".
The irony is that at some places women are becoming "Mahakali" by recognizing their own form. But, there is a need to create "Shiva" and "Mahashiv" to handle and groom that "Mahakali", that "superpower", who is ready to respect his "power" before respecting himself.
We have also determined the outlook of the society, or we can change it as well. Whatever we say, the society says the same, whatever we do, the society also does the same. That is, the society belongs to us. But the situation becomes critical when we start accepting that "we belong to the society".
According to the society, Parvati did penance to get Shiva. But if we look deeply, there is another truth behind this that Shiva had done austerity to get Parvati. Parvati has always given more importance to Karma in her life after taking birth. No matter how many births Parvati has taken, but by not marrying in every birth, choosing Shiva in the last birth as a result of her penance, she has explained to the world that in fact "woman" does not need a man, but a "woman". "Shakti" needs "Shiva".
Think, if Shankar had not made himself Shiva by doing hard penance, would he have got "Shakti".?!
~ Must think.
Muskan khan
22-Dec-2022 07:32 PM
Superb
Reply
Swati Sharma
22-Dec-2022 08:54 PM
Thank you ma'am ππ»
Reply
Renu
22-Dec-2022 01:39 PM
Very nice π
Reply
Swati Sharma
22-Dec-2022 04:01 PM
Thank you ma'am ππ»
Reply
Punam verma
21-Dec-2022 09:43 AM
Nice
Reply
Swati Sharma
21-Dec-2022 01:52 PM
Thanks ma'am
Reply